top of page

Why Top NRL Pathways NRLW Coaches Fail in NRLW (Lisa Fiaola, Tasha Gale, Harvey Norman) — And No One Wants to Admit It

  • Writer: John Fadel
    John Fadel
  • Apr 19
  • 4 min read

Updated: Apr 19

NRLW coaching failure explained showing difference between boys and girls rugby league coaching styles


Introduction


Let’s make one thing very clear from the start.


This is not an attack on coaches.


Most of these coaches are highly experienced, successful, and respected in the boys’ game. Many of them don’t even realise they’re being set up to fail when they step into the female pathways.


But there is a reality that needs to be exposed.


Because what’s happening right now isn’t helping players — it’s hurting them.


And I’ve seen it year after year after year.


I’ve been there from the very beginning, when the girls’ game was closer to touch football than what it is today.


Read about our femail pathways


The Reality No One Wants to Talk About - Why NRLW coaches fail


Success in the boys’ pathways does not transfer to the girls’ game.


It doesn’t.


And the problem is — it takes coaches one to two years to realise that.


By the time they adjust, the damage is already done.


Players miss development windows. Confidence drops. Opportunities are lost.


This is not opinion.


This is happening every single year across Lisa Fiaola, Tasha Gale, and Harvey Norman pathways.


The Biggest Myth in Rugby League Coaching


There’s a belief in rugby league that:


“A good coach can coach anywhere.”


That might sound right — but in the NRLW pathways, it’s wrong.


Completely wrong.


Coaching in the boys’ system and coaching in the girls’ system are two completely different environments, different development models, and different games.


Treating them the same is where everything starts to break down.


Why Top NRL Pathways Coaches Fail in NRLW

The Game Is Physically Different — But It’s Coached the Same


The boys’ system is built around:


  • size

  • speed

  • repetition


It allows:


  • lateral movement at speed

  • explosive recovery

  • minimal margin for error


The girls’ game is different.


You’re dealing with:


  • different physical development stages

  • different fatigue patterns

  • different contact confidence


Yet it’s coached the same way.


That’s the mistake.



You Can’t Coach NRLW Like a Slower Version of the Boys Game


Let’s make something really clear.


In the boys’ game:


  • you can play laterally early

  • you can rely on speed and explosiveness

  • players only need half a hole and they’re through


In the girls’ game:


Even if it’s only half a step slower, that changes everything.


If you shift too early:


  • the defence slides

  • space disappears

  • opportunities are gone


One of the most effective ways to play the girls’ game has always been through the middle first.


You earn the right to go lateral.


You create space before you use it.


Have a look at some Case Studies


Communication Style — This Is Where It Falls Apart


In the boys’ system:


  • communication is direct

  • aggressive

  • command-based


That works there.


In the girls’ game, it doesn’t work the same.


You need:


  • clarity

  • understanding

  • connection


And even with that connection — it takes longer to build.


This isn’t about being softer.


It’s about being smarter in how you deliver.


I’ve seen many coaches fail because they think they can just come in and be tough with the girls.


That doesn’t work.


You can be strong — I am.


But there’s an art to it.


You have to:


  • build trust

  • build knowledge

  • build education

  • prove you know what you’re talking about


You can’t just walk in and demand it.



They’re Coaching a System That Doesn’t Exist


Boys’ pathways are:


  • structured

  • predictable


Female pathways are:


  • newer

  • inconsistent

  • full of late developers


Yet coaches apply the same system.


But that system doesn’t exist in the female game.


That’s one of the biggest problems in the game.


The Real Problem — Ego


This is where it really breaks.


Coaches come in with:


  • reputation

  • experience

  • success


But:


  • they don’t adapt

  • they don’t listen

  • they don’t reset


The problem isn’t knowledge.


It’s the refusal to adjust.


That’s ego.



Why It Takes 1–2 Years To Realise


Year one:


  • confusion

  • inconsistent results

  • frustration

  • blame shifts to players


Year two:


  • small adjustments

  • better understanding


But by then — the damage is already done.


The Two Years That Get Wasted


Two years of development gone.


  • players miss opportunities

  • confidence drops

  • progress slows


In pathways — timing matters.


Who Pays The Price?


It’s not the coaches.


It’s:


  • the players

  • the parents

  • the pathways


This isn’t about coaches failing.


It’s about players being let down.


What Good NRLW Coaching Actually Looks Like


You need to:


  • understand what you’re scouting

  • know how you want to play

  • place players correctly


A player playing fullback or halfback in New Zealand doesn’t automatically fit those roles here.


You must:


  • build a system

  • find the right players

  • have depth in positions


You also need to understand:


  • body reshaping

  • physical progression


Build:


  • confidence and skill together

  • belief

  • trust


That’s how you create winning pathways.


Development vs Winning — Where It’s Lost


If you coach to win aggressively…


You fail long-term.


If you coach to develop:


  • players improve

  • systems improve

  • results follow


That’s the difference.


The Uncomfortable Truth Clubs Don’t Talk About


There is a strong ego in the system — including at club level.


Clubs say they care about girls’ pathways.


In reality?


It’s often treated as a burden.


And here’s the truth.


When a coach isn’t right for a role in the boys’ system…


They get moved into the girls’ pathways.


Not because it’s right.


Because it’s convenient.


It becomes:


  • a way to avoid a tough decision

  • a way to move a problem


It’s sold as:

“We’ve brought in an experienced coach.”


But the reality is:


The girls wear that decision.


That coach might become good in the female space.


But it takes time.


And that time?


Costs players development.


Another one to two years gone.


We are trying to grow the game.


Not slow it down.


Final Statement


This isn’t about attacking coaches.


It’s about understanding the game.


Until NRLW is no longer treated as an extension of the boys’ system…


The game will continue to fail the very players it’s meant to develop.





Comments


bottom of page